From Endorsement to Adoption: Examining How Perceived Risk, Perceived Benefits, and Attitude Drive Electric Vehicle Adoption Intention Under Environmental Concern

Authors

  • Delicia Vanessa Universitas Pelita Harapan
  • Juniarty Juniarty Universitas Pelita Harapan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jupiman.v5i3.6737

Keywords:

Electric Vehicles, Environmental Concern, Perceived Endorsement, Perceived Risk, Purchase Intention

Abstract

This study examines how perceived endorsement, range anxiety, perceived benefits, perceived risks, attitude toward electric vehicles (EVs), and environmental concern shape Indonesian consumers’ EV adoption and purchase intentions. A quantitative causal survey produced 451 responses, of which 404 usable cases were analyzed using PLS-SEM in SmartPLS 4 with a disjoint two-stage approach for higher-order constructs. Perceived endorsement increased perceived benefits and attitude while reducing range anxiety. Range anxiety increased perceived risk; perceived risk weakened attitude and adoption intention. Attitude increased adoption and purchase intentions, perceived benefits increased purchase intention, and adoption intention increased purchase intention. Environmental concern directly strengthened attitude, adoption intention, and purchase intention and significantly moderated key relationships. The findings show that EV acceptance in Indonesia depends on credible endorsement, tangible benefits, lower perceived risk and range anxiety, and environmental concern translated into practical consumer value. These findings provide important insights into the factors influencing consumer decision-making regarding EVs in Indonesia. The study also highlights the importance of strengthening positive perceptions and reducing psychological barriers associated with EV ownership. By understanding these relationships, policymakers, manufacturers, and other stakeholders can develop more effective strategies to encourage EV adoption and support the transition toward sustainable transportation in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Boakye, A. N., Asravor, R. K., & Essuman, J. (2023). Work-life balance as predictors of job satisfaction in the tertiary educational sector. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2162686. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2162686

Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500

Huda, N., Putri, D. K., & Ancok, D. (2023). Mediation role of work life balance on the effect of perceived organization support on lecturer job satisfaction at private university in Jakarta during COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Social Work Journal, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.47405/aswj.v8i1.241

Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001). The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127(3), 376–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376

Mahzan, F. A., & Mohd Nordin, N. (2021). The relationship between transformational leadership practiced and the level of job satisfaction among lecturers in MARA Professional College, Malaysia. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i3.14511

Mascarenhas, C., Galvão, A. R., & Marques, C. S. (2022). How perceived organizational support, identification with organization and work engagement influence job satisfaction: A gender-based perspective. Administrative Sciences, 12(2), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12020066

Nasution, N. N., & Karneli, O. (2023). Pengaruh perceived organizational support terhadap kinerja melalui kepuasan kerja karyawan PT. Artha Veda Pekanbaru. Jurnal Simki Economic, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.29407/jse.v6i2.161

Rizal, S., Rasulong, I., & Wahjono, S. I. (2024). Leadership, environment, and lecturer performance: The mediating role of job satisfaction in Islamic higher education. Al-Tanzim: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.33650/al-tanzim.v8i4.9215

Rosnani, T. (2014). Pengaruh kepemimpinan transaksional dan kepemimpinan transformasional terhadap kepuasan kerja dan kinerja dosen Universitas Tanjungpura Pontianak. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.26418/jebik.v3i1.9886

Sancoko, S., Yuliawan, R., Al Aufa, B., & Yuliyanto, H. (2023). The effects of job satisfaction on lecturer performance: Case study in Faculty X Universitas Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 29(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v29i1.47683

Siregar, Z. M. E., Harahap, M. A., Sari, R. N., & Damanik, S. K. (2026). Perceived organizational support and job satisfaction: Does knowledge sharing mediate it? Journal of Management and Digital Business, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.53088/jmdb.v6i2.3002

Sulistyowati, P., Imaliya, T., Kusumawati, D., & Huwaida, H. L. A. (2025). The contribution of perceived organizational support to job satisfaction through the role of work engagement among academics at private universities. Jurnal Ilmiah Edunomika, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.29040/jie.v9i4.18344

Suriyanto, Patisina, & Lubis, R. (2025). Perceived organizational support and lecturer professionalism: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Educational, Health and Community Psychology. https://doi.org/10.12928/jehcp.vi.31282

Thevanes, N., & Saranraj, Y. (2018). The impact of perceived organizational support on job satisfaction of academic staff. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 6(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJEBA/2018/39809

Wahyudi. (2020). Kinerja dosen: Kontribusinya terhadap akreditasi. Scientific Journal of Reflection: Economic, Accounting, Management and Business, 3(4), 401–410. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4427642

Downloads

Published

2026-09-02

How to Cite

Delicia Vanessa, & Juniarty Juniarty. (2026). From Endorsement to Adoption: Examining How Perceived Risk, Perceived Benefits, and Attitude Drive Electric Vehicle Adoption Intention Under Environmental Concern. Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Manajemen, 5(3), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.55606/jupiman.v5i3.6737