PENGARUH UKURAN PERUSAHAAN, TINGKAT HUTANG, KEPEMILIKAN MANAJERIAL, KOMITE AUDIT TERHADAP PERSISTENSI LABA

Authors

  • Aprilia Maharani Firdousy Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang
  • Dirvi Surya Abbas Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang
  • Daniel Rahandri Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang
  • Indra Gunawan Siregar Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jupiman.v1i4.664

Keywords:

earning persistence, firm size, debt level, manajerial ownership, audit committee

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of firm size, debt level, managerial ownership, audit comitte on earnings persistence in property and real estate companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). The research time period use is 6 years, namely the 2016-2021 period. The sampling technique use purposive sampling technique. Based on the predetermined criteria obtained 15 companies. The type of data use is secondary data obtained from the Indonesia Stock Exchange website. The analytical method used is panel data regression analysis. The result showed that the company’s debt level had no effect on earnings persistence. Meanwhile, cash flow volatility has a effect on eranings persistence.

 

 

References

Anggraeni, B.M (2015). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhi Persistensi Laba. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Bakrie, 3(3).1-2

Dewata, E., Sari, Y. & Fithri, E. J.(2016) Kepemilikan Manajerial dan Kepemilikan Institusional Sebagai Determinan Struktur Modal dan Persistensi Laba. Jurnal Riset dan Akuntansi: Akuntansi dan Manajemen, 1(3). 73-84

Eksandy, Arry (2018). Metode Penelitian Akuntansi dan Manajemen

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

www.idx.com.id

Downloads

Published

2022-11-14

How to Cite

Aprilia Maharani Firdousy, Dirvi Surya Abbas, Daniel Rahandri, & Indra Gunawan Siregar. (2022). PENGARUH UKURAN PERUSAHAAN, TINGKAT HUTANG, KEPEMILIKAN MANAJERIAL, KOMITE AUDIT TERHADAP PERSISTENSI LABA. Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Manajemen, 1(4), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.55606/jupiman.v1i4.664