Hybrid TCN GRU Based Multi-Horizon Forecasting with Adaptive Conformal Prediction for Decision Support Systems

Authors

  • Danang Danang Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer
  • Toni Wijanarko Adi Putra Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jtmei.v3i3.6156

Keywords:

Conformal Prediction, Multi-Horizon Forecasting, TCN-GRU Hybrid, Time-Series Forecasting, Uncertainty Estimation

Abstract

Multivariate time-series forecasting has become an essential component in energy systems and industrial monitoring applications, where changing data distributions and temporal non-stationarity reduce the reliability of point predictions alone for decision-making purposes. This study investigates multi-horizon forecasting on the ETTh1 benchmark with oil temperature (OT) as the prediction target. The research focuses on two key challenges: integrating short-term pattern extraction with long-range temporal dependency modeling in a lightweight forecasting framework, and providing distribution-free uncertainty estimation that remains reliable under temporal drift conditions. To address these issues, a hybrid forecasting architecture is proposed by combining a causal dilated Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) for local feature extraction and a Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) layer for modeling longer sequential dependencies. The model simultaneously predicts four forecasting horizons 96, 192, 336, and 720 steps using multivariate observations and temporal features from a fixed historical window. For uncertainty estimation, time-aware conformal prediction is implemented through chronological train, calibration, and test partitions. The study compares conventional static conformal intervals with an adaptive rolling approach that dynamically updates horizon-specific quantiles based on recent residual patterns. Experimental results on the ETTh1 dataset demonstrate that the proposed hybrid model achieves superior forecasting accuracy compared with standalone TCN and GRU baselines, obtaining an MAE of 4.615 and RMSE of 5.382 for OT prediction. Furthermore, the adaptive conformal strategy improves empirical coverage from 0.790 to 0.870 while maintaining a relatively moderate increase in prediction interval width. A threshold-based decision-support mechanism utilizing the predictive upper bound is also introduced to illustrate how calibrated uncertainty intervals can support practical trade-offs between false alarms and missed detections. Overall, the proposed framework offers an efficient and reproducible solution for uncertainty-aware multi-horizon forecasting in dynamic environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Angelopoulos, A. N., & Bates, S. (2021). A gentle introduction to conformal prediction and distribution-free uncertainty quantification. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2107.07511.

Bai, S., Kolter, J. Z., & Koltun, V. (2018). An empirical evaluation of generic convolutional and recurrent networks for sequence modeling. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1803.01271.

Bandara, K., Bergmeir, C., & Smyl, S. (2020). Forecasting across time series databases using recurrent neural networks on groups of similar series: A clustering approach. International Journal of Forecasting, 36(4), 1227–1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112896

Barber, R. F., Candès, E. J., Ramdas, A., & Tibshirani, R. J. (2021). Predictive inference with the jackknife+. The Annals of Statistics, 49(1), 486–507. https://doi.org/10.1214/20-AOS1965

Cho, K., van Merriënboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/D14-1179

Gibbs, I., & Candès, E. (2021). Adaptive conformal inference under distribution shift. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS).

Hewamalage, H., Bergmeir, C., & Bandara, K. (2021). Recurrent neural networks for time series forecasting: Current status and future directions. International Journal of Forecasting, 37(1), 388–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2020.06.008

Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2015). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).

Lim, B., Arik, S. O., Loeff, N., & Pfister, T. (2021). Temporal fusion transformers for interpretable multi-horizon time series forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting, 37(4), 1748–1764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.03.012

Makridakis, S., Spiliotis, E., & Assimakopoulos, V. (2018). The M4 competition: Results, findings, conclusion and way forward. International Journal of Forecasting, 34(4), 802–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2018.06.001

Nie, Y., et al. (2023a). A time series is worth 64 words: Long-term forecasting with transformers. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).

Nie, Y., et al. (2023b). TimesNet: Temporal 2D-variation modeling for general time series analysis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).

Oreshkin, B. N., Carpov, D., Chapados, N., & Bengio, Y. (2020). N-BEATS: Neural basis expansion analysis for interpretable time series forecasting. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).

Romano, Y., Patterson, E., & Candès, E. (2019). Conformalized quantile regression. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS).

Salinas, D., Flunkert, V., Gasthaus, J., & Januschowski, T. (2020). DeepAR: Probabilistic forecasting with autoregressive recurrent networks. International Journal of Forecasting, 36(3), 1181–1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.07.001

Smyl, S. (2020). A hybrid method of exponential smoothing and recurrent neural networks for time series forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting, 36(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.03.017

Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2014). Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15(56), 1929–1958.

Tibshirani, R. J., Foygel Barber, R., & Candès, E. (2019). Conformal prediction under covariate shift. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS).

Vovk, V., Gammerman, A., & Shafer, G. (2005). Algorithmic learning in a random world. Springer.

Wu, H., Xu, J., Wang, J., & Long, M. (2021). Autoformer: Decomposition transformers with auto-correlation for long-term series forecasting. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS).

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

Danang Danang, & Toni Wijanarko Adi Putra. (2024). Hybrid TCN GRU Based Multi-Horizon Forecasting with Adaptive Conformal Prediction for Decision Support Systems. Jurnal Teknik Mesin, Industri, Elektro Dan Informatika, 3(3), 426–450. https://doi.org/10.55606/jtmei.v3i3.6156