Pengaruh Jenis Sensor terhadap Persentase Eror Sensor Parkir Berbasis STM32

Authors

  • Qais Rakhmanda Yoga Pratama Politeknik Negeri Malang
  • Asrori Asrori Politeknik Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jtmei.v3i3.4120

Keywords:

HY-SRF05, JSN-SR04T, STM32

Abstract

This study evaluates the impact of sensor type on the percentage error in an STM32-based parking sensor system by comparing the HY-SRF05 and JSN-SR04T ultrasonic sensors. The aim of this research is to determine the accuracy of each sensor in distance measurement and identify the more reliable sensor for parking sensor applications. The methodology includes installing both sensors on the STM32 system, measuring distances at various intervals, and analyzing the percentage error. The results indicate that the HY-SRF05 sensor exhibits a lower percentage error compared to the JSN-SR04T across all tested distances, from 50 cm to 300 cm. The average percentage error for the HY-SRF05 is 1.78%, while for the JSN-SR04T it is 2.6%. The conclusion of this research is that the HY-SRF05 sensor is more accurate and reliable than the JSN-SR04T for STM32-based parking sensor applications.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arsada, B. (2017). Aplikasi sensor ultrasonik untuk deteksi posisi jarak pada ruang menggunakan Arduino Uno. Jurnal Teknik Elektro, 6(2), 1–8.

Frima Yudha, P. S., & Sani, R. A. (2019). Implementasi sensor ultrasonik HC-SR04 sebagai sensor parkir mobil berbasis Arduino. EINSTEIN E-JOURNAL, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.24114/einstein.v5i3.12002

Ilham, R. (2024). Analisis pengaruh kepekatan asap terhadap waktu respon alat pendeteksi asap berbasis Arduino. 2(4).

Iqbal, M., & Kamaludin, A. (2021). Analisis faktor penyebab kecelakaan kerja pada pekerja pertambangan. Jurnal Keselamatan Kesehatan Kerja Dan Lingkungan, 02(1), 64–70.

Madya, S. (2007). Metodologi pengajaran bahasa: Dari era prametode sampai era pascametode. UNY Press.

Martawati, M. E., Susilo, S. H., A, A., & W, L. (2021). Automatic mirror folding design Arduino-based. Logic: Jurnal Rancang Bangun Dan Teknologi, 21(2), 93–96. https://doi.org/10.31940/logic.v21i2.2503

Primadianto, D., Putri, S. K., & Alifen, R. S. (2018). Pengaruh tindakan tidak aman (unsafe act) dan kondisi tidak aman (unsafe condition) terhadap kecelakaan kerja konstruksi. Jurnal Dimensi Pratama Teknik Sipil, 7(1), 77–84. https://publication.petra.ac.id/index.php/teknik-sipil/article/view/7036

Rahmanto, Y., Burlian, A., & Samsugi, S. (2021). Sistem kendali otomatis pada akuaponik berbasis mikrokontroler Arduino Uno R3. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Tertanam, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.33365/jtst.v2i1.975

Rohmanu, Ajar, & Widiyanto, D. (2018). Sistem sensor jarak aman pada mobil berbasis mikrokontroller Arduino Atmega328. Jurnal Informatika SIMANTIK, 3(1), 7–14.

Sianipar, A. M. V., Solikhun, S., Saputra, W., Parlina, I., & Nasution, Z. M. (2021). Sistem pengamanan pintu menggunakan E-KTP berbasis Arduino Uno Mega2560. Jurnal RESISTOR (Rekayasa Sistem Komputer), 4(2), 127–133. https://doi.org/10.31598/jurnalresistor.v4i2.698

Thowil Afif, M., & Ayu Putri Pratiwi, I. (2015). Analisis perbandingan baterai lithium-ion, lithium-polymer, lead acid dan nickel-metal hydride pada penggunaan mobil listrik - review. Jurnal Rekayasa Mesin, 6(2), 95–99. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jrm.2015.006.02.1

Wright, A., Betteridge, D., & Buckby, M. (2006). Games for language learning. Cambridge University Press.

Published

2024-07-31

How to Cite

Qais Rakhmanda Yoga Pratama, & Asrori Asrori. (2024). Pengaruh Jenis Sensor terhadap Persentase Eror Sensor Parkir Berbasis STM32. Jurnal Teknik Mesin, Industri, Elektro Dan Informatika, 3(3), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.55606/jtmei.v3i3.4120