Implementasi Metode Technique For Order Preference By Similarity To Ideal Solution (Topsis) Dalam Penunjang Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Guru
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jtmei.v2i4.2960Keywords:
Teacher Performance, Topsis, SDN Inpres 09 BandungAbstract
The purpose of this research is to build a decision support system for evaluating teacher performance using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method at SDN Inpres 09 Bandung. decision support for teacher performance evaluation uses the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method which can be used by school principals and assessment teams to provide teacher performance assessments. If previously when not using the system in the teacher performance appraisal process it took 1 week, now with the teacher performance appraisal system, the selection time is shorter, namely 15 minutes to 30 minutes. So that routine activities within the scope of SDN Inpres 09 Bandung are not disturbed by the process of evaluating teacher performance, then the process of making reports becomes easier and more systematic.
References
A.S Rosa dan M. Shalahuddin, 2010, Modul Pembelajaran Pemrograman Berorientasi Objek, Bandung: Modula. Rosa A.S dan M. Shalahuddin, 2013, Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak, Bandung: Informatika.
Banerjee, D., 2020. The impact of Covid‐19 pandemic on elderly mental health. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, pp.1-2.
Dessler, Gary. 2019. Manajemen SDM : buku 1. Jakarta: Indeks.
Dewanto. (2015). Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Investasi Saham dengan Metode SAW di Bursa Efek Jakarta, Skripsi, Teknik Informatika Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta.
Ilyas S. 2017. Kinerja Pegawai dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dengan Metode AHP. STMIK Budi Darma Medan (2): 119–125.
Japerson, Hutahaean. (2015). Konsep Sistem Informasi. Yogyakarta: CV Budi Utama.
Kusrini. 2011. Konsep dan Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Penerbit Andi, Yogyakarta.
Little, J. D. C. (1970). Models and managers: the concept of a decision calculus. Management Science.
Moh Faizal 2015. Indikator Kinerja Managemen System. Jurnal Inovasi Informatika (1): 64–71.
Mulyadi Ditdit Utama Nugeraha, 2017, Sistem Filosofi, Teori dan Implementasi, Yogyakarta: Penerbit Garudhawaca.
Munawar, Rosmiati, Donny Teguh Santosa Junias. (2015). Sikap, Motivasi, dan Minat Berwirausaha Mahasiswa. VOL. 17, NO. 1, MARET 2015, 21–30 DOI: 10.9744/jmk.17.1.21–30 ISSN 1411-1438 print / ISSN 2338-8234 online.
Pressman, R.S. (2015). Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak: Pendekatan Praktisi Buku I. Yogyakarta: Andi
Saaty, T. L, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York : McGraw- Hill, 1980.
Saaty, T. L, Pengambilan Keputusan Bagi Para Pemimpin, Proses Hirarki Analitik untuk Pengambilan Keputusan dalam Situasi yang Kompleks. Pustaka Binama Pressindo, 1993.
Saaty, T. L. (2013). Models, Methods, Concepts & Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process Second Edition. Springer New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London.
Subakti, Yulis, 2014, Sistem penunjang keputusan seleksi penerimaan account officer, Pontianak : CSRID Journal.
Taylor. L. 2014. Decision making with the analityc hierarchy process, International Journal of Services Scienses, 1(1), p. 83. doi: 10.154/IJSSCI.2008.017590
Turban, Efraim. (2013). Electronic Commerce : A Managerial perspective. Prentice Hall. New Jersey.
Turban, E., Aronson, J. E., & Liang, T. (2015). Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems. Andi.
Whitten, I. H., Frank, E., Hall, M. A. 2011. Data Mining Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques (3rd ed). USA: Elsevier.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Teknik Mesin, Industri, Elektro dan Informatika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
