RATIO DECIDENDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 49/PUU-X/2012 TENTANG PEMBATALAN PASAL 66 AYAT (1) UUJN-2004
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v1i3.868Keywords:
Ratio Decide on MK Decisions and Cancellation of Article 66 Paragraph (1) UUJN-2004Abstract
This study aims to: (1) analyze and find the ratio of the decision of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 49/PUU-X/2012 concerning the annulment of Article 66 paragraph (1) UUJN-2004, (2) the legal impact of the Constitutional Court's decision no. 49/PUU-X/2012 Against Legal Protection for Notaries. The type of research is normative law. While the research approach used, namely: Legislation, contextual approach, and case approach, as well as a comparative approach. The legal materials used in this study are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. While the analysis of legal materials using qualitative analysis.
The results of the study show that: (1) The ratio decidendi of the cancellation of Article 66 paragraph (1) of Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary Public is based, that the article is not in accordance with the principle of equality before the law (equality in law) for every citizen. There is the approval of the Notary Honorary Council, not in accordance with the sense of justice and the criminal law enforcement process, as well as the principle of an independent judicial power; (2) Legal Impact of MK Decision No. 49/Puu-X/2012 Regarding Legal Protection for Notaries, the notary loses his special rights, namely summoning a Notary in the case of interest in a criminal examination does not need to obtain permission from the Regional Supervisory Council as stipulated in the provisions of Article 66 of the JN Law, this is for guarantee legal certainty and responsibility for the deed issued.
References
Buku
Muhaimin, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Mataram: Mataram University Press, 2020
Munir Fuady, Hukum Tentang Pembiayaan, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2006
Rupert Cross, Precedent in English Law, Editor J.W. Harris, Published, England, 1991
Sudikno Mertokusumo, Mengenal Hukum: Sebuah Pengantar, Yogyakarta: Liberty 2008
Satjipto Rahardjo, Ilmu Hukum, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000
Jurnal
Agustin, Y. N., & Ana, N. R., Pemanggilan notaris tak perlu persetujuan majelis pengawas daerah. Majalah Konstitusi, Juni, 2013, h. 76, 41.
Septinierco Agraperta, Amzulian Rifai, dan Anna Sagita, Anotasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 49/PUU-X/2012 Tentang Uji Materil Pasal 66 Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris, Reperterium, Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotaritan, 5 Issue: 1, Mei 2016, h. 49
Trias Palupi Kurnianingrum, Trias Palupi Kurnianingrum Dampak Hukum Putusan Mk No. 49|Puu'x12012 Terhadap Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Notaris, Pusat Pengkajian, Pengolahan Data dan Informasi (P3Dl) Sekretariat Jenderal DPR Rl, Vol. 13 No. 3, September 2013
Sri Utami, dkk., Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris, jurnal Jurnal Repertorium, ISSN:2355-2646, Edisi 3 Januari-Juni 2015
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang - Udang Dasar 1945
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata
Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitsi.
Undang - Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 3, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5491)
