Desain Konstitusional Sendi Pemerintahan dalam Penguatan Akuntabilitas Publik Menuju Good Constitutional Governance

Authors

  • Zul Amirul Haq Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
  • Wahyu Donri Tinambunan Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
  • Halimah Erikarani Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v5i3.6783

Keywords:

Constitutional Architecture, Constitutional Governance Index, Good Constitutional Governance, Pillars of Government, Public Accountability

Abstract

Public accountability is a fundamental principle of a constitutional democratic state, requiring the exercise of public power to be grounded in constitutional principles, effective oversight, and accountable governance. However, the implementation of public administration in Indonesia continues to experience an accountability deficit due to the lack of an integrated constitutional framework governing interinstitutional relations. This study aims to examine the constitutional position of the pillars of government as the foundation for strengthening public accountability and to formulate the concept of Good Constitutional Governance. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings reveal that the pillars of government should no longer be understood merely through the classical doctrine of separation of powers, but rather as a constitutional architecture that integrates the distribution of powers, interinstitutional relations, oversight mechanisms, and accountability within a unified constitutional ecosystem. The study proposes the Good Constitutional Governance model, supported by the Constitutional Governance Index (CGI), as a constitutional evaluation framework for promoting democratic, accountable, adaptive, and equitable governance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ackerman, B. (2000). The new separation of powers. Harvard Law Review, 113(3), 633–725. https://doi.org/10.2307/1342286

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Asshiddiqie, J. (2005). Gagasan negara hukum Indonesia. Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2006a). Pengantar ilmu hukum tata negara. Konstitusi Press.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2006b). Perkembangan dan konsolidasi lembaga negara pasca reformasi. Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.

Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x

Cohler, A. M., Miller, B. C., & Stone, H. S. (1989). Montesquieu: The spirit of the laws. Cambridge University Press.

Dicey, A. V. (1982). Introduction to the study of the law of the constitution. Liberty Fund.

Fox-Decent, E. (2004). The fiduciary nature of state legal authority. Queen’s Law Journal, 31(1), 259–310.

Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system. Russell Sage Foundation.

Friedrich, C. J. (1968). Constitutional government and democracy: Theory and practice in Europe and America (4th ed.). Blaisdell Publishing Company.

Huq, A., & Ginsburg, T. (2018). How to lose a constitutional democracy. University of Chicago Law School, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2901776

Indonesia. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Pasal 1 ayat (2) dan ayat (3).

Indonesia. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Pasal 4 ayat (1).

Indonesia. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Pasal 20 ayat (1).

Indonesia. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Pasal 23E.

Indonesia. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Pasal 24 ayat (1).

Indonesia. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Pasal 24C.

Indonesia. (1999). Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 1999 tentang Penyelenggaraan Negara yang Bersih dan Bebas dari Korupsi, Kolusi, dan Nepotisme, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1999 Nomor 75, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3851, Pasal 3.

Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 292, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5601, Pasal 5–10.

Indonesia. (2023). Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2023 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2023 Nomor 141, Pasal 3–4.

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 5430, 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5430

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2006). Putusan Nomor 005/PUU-IV/2006 mengenai pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2004 tentang Komisi Yudisial dan Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2004 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman terhadap UUD NRI Tahun 1945, paragraf [3.16]–[3.18], hlm. 210–215.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2011a). Putusan Nomor 49/PUU-IX/2011 mengenai pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap UUD NRI Tahun 1945, pertimbangan hukum, hlm. 82–86.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2011b). Putusan Nomor 81/PUU-IX/2011 mengenai pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan terhadap UUD NRI Tahun 1945, pertimbangan hukum, hlm. 54–58.

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678

OECD. (2012). Recommendation of the Council on regulatory policy and governance. OECD Publishing.

Paramitha, A. A., Widodo, I. S., Amin, F., Fajar, M., Widodo, S., Kamil, H., Muhtar, M. H., et al. (2023). Hukum administrasi negara. PT Sada Kurnia Pustaka.

Saldi Isra. (2010). Pergeseran fungsi legislasi. Rajawali Pers.

Schillemans, T. (2010). Redundant accountability: The joint impact of horizontal and vertical accountability on autonomous agencies. Public Administration Review, 301–329.

United Nations Development Programme. (1997). Governance for sustainable human development: A UNDP policy document. UNDP.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-04

How to Cite

Zul Amirul Haq, Wahyu Donri Tinambunan, & Halimah Erikarani. (2026). Desain Konstitusional Sendi Pemerintahan dalam Penguatan Akuntabilitas Publik Menuju Good Constitutional Governance. JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL, 5(3), 440–457. https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v5i3.6783