Pemulihan Aset Negara atas Lahan Hutan Lindung yang Dikuasai Individu melalui Penguatan Peran Intelijen Kejaksaan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v5i3.6657Keywords:
Freehold Title Certificate, Land Possession, Prosecutorial Intelligence, Protected Forest, State Asset RecoveryAbstract
The occupation of protected forest land by individuals through land ownership certificates creates a complex legal problem because it intersects forestry law, land registration, prosecutorial intelligence, and the doctrine of state asset recovery. Protected forest areas are not merely administrative objects but ecological public assets whose function is connected to water regulation, erosion control, flood prevention, and the protection of public welfare. This article aims to analyze the legal framework governing protected forests, the position of land certificates issued over protected forest areas, the role of prosecutorial intelligence in detecting and supporting the recovery of state assets, and the structural and substantive barriers that hinder recovery efforts. The research applies a normative juridical method supported by empirical orientation through a case-based reading of the emergence of individual ownership claims over protected forest land in the Sambas/Pemangkat context. The analysis shows that prosecutorial intelligence may play a strategic role in early detection, data collection, legal mapping, asset tracing, interagency coordination, and prevention of further transfer or exploitation. However, its role must be framed as support for lawful recovery rather than direct land execution. The main barriers include fragmented authority, sectoral ego, non-integrated forest and land data, limited technical capacity, and the absence of a comprehensive non-conviction based asset forfeiture mechanism. The article proposes an integrated forest-land asset recovery model based on synchronized geospatial data, legal audit of certificates, interagency protocols, temporary object security, and ecological restoration. This model is expected to strengthen legal certainty, protect state assets, and support environmental justice.
Downloads
References
Abas, M., Purnama, W. W., Ramadianto, A. Y., Satria, F., Effendy, W., & Munir, S. (2023). ILMU HUKUM (Konseptualisasi Epistimologi Prinsip Hukum dalam Konstitusi Negara). Balai LIterasi Bangsa.
Aprian Hidayat, R. (2016). Analisis Yuridis Proses Pembatalan Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah Pada Kawasan Hutan. Jurnal IUS, 2.
Atika, N., & Ferry Rosando, A. (2023). KEDUDUKAN SERTIFIKA HAK MILIK DALAM PENGUASAAN KAWASAN HUTAN. Journal Evidence Of Law, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.59066/jel.v2i2.273
Bayuaji, R., & Hadi, F. (2025). Asset Recovery In Corruption Cases In Indonesia: A Human Rights Perspective. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v19no1.4024
DPR RI. (2009). Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria (UUPA). In Berkas DPR RI (Vol. 10, Issue 3).
Harsono, B. (2003). Hukum Agraria Indonesia : Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria, Isi dan Pelaksanaannya | Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi. In Hukum Agraria Indonesia.
Hasbia, W. O., Laturette, A. I., & Fataruba, S. (2022). Pembatalan Sertifikat Hak Milik Atas Tanah. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(8). https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i8.801
Ikhwansyah, I., & . D. (2018). Cacat Yuridis dan Cacat Administrasi Dalam Pembatalan Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah. JATISWARA, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.29303/jtsw.v33i1.154
Undang-Undang Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 41 Tahun 1999 tentang Kehutanan, Demographic Research (2005).
Indonesia, R. of. (2021). UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2O2I TENTANG PERUBAHAN ATAS UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 16 TAHUN 2OO4 TENTANG KEJAKSAAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA. Menteri Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia, 112784.
Johnny Ibrahim. (2013). Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. In Teori Metodologi Penelitian a.
Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Metode Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi. In Jakarta: Kencana.
Miracle G. H. Lontoh. (2018). KAJIAN YURIDIS PROSES PEMBATALAN SERTIFIKAT HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH DI PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA. Jurnal Lex Administratum, 6(3).
Philipus M. Hardjon. (2002). Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia Introduction to Indonesian Administrative Law. Gajah Mada University Press, 0(0).
Rispalman. (2023). Hukum Administrasi Negara: Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Negara. In Penerbit Yayasan Prima Agus Teknik.
Rohman, M. M., Mu’minin, N., Masuwd, M., & Elihami, E. (2024). Methodological Reasoning Finds Law Using Normative Studies (Theory, Approach and Analysis of Legal Materials). MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 4(2), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.47498/maqasidi.v4i2.3379
Salim.H.S. (2006). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Kehutanan. Hutan Dan Kehutanan - Aspek Hukum.
Sari, N. L. A. (2021). Konsep Hak Menguasai Negara Terhadap Tanah. Jurnal Ganec Swara, 15(1).
Siregar, Y. O. J., & Sitabuana, T. H. (2023). Kejaksaan RI Dalam Lembaga Negara. Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika ISSN 2721-4796 (Online), 4(2).
Subagiyo, H. (2014). Anotasi Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup. In Jakarta: Indonesian Center for Environmental Law (Vol. 1, Issue 32).
Sumardjono, M. S. . (2019). Tanah dalam Perspektif Hak Ekonomi, Sosial dan Budaya. In Jakarta: Kompas.
Suwarno, E., Nurrochmat, D. R., & Sunarta, S. (2025). NEGARA, HUTAN, DAN MASYARAKAT DALAM UU 41 TAHUN 1999: SEBUAH ANALISIS POLITIK EKOLOGI. RISALAH KEBIJAKAN PERTANIAN DAN LINGKUNGAN Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian Dan Lingkungan, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v12i2.64859
Tahir, R., Astawa, I. G. P., Widjajanto, A., Panggabean, M. L., Rohman, M. M., Dewi, N. P. P., Deliarnoor, N. A., Abas, M., Ayu, R. F., Meinarni, N. P. S., Hs, F., Sumartini, N. W. E., Sugiharti, D. K., & Paminto, S. R. (2023). METODOLOGI PENELITIAN BIDANG HUKUM: Suatu Pendekatan Teori dan Praktik. In M. M. Rohman (Ed.), PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia (1st ed., pp. 1–275). PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=e4jhEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA118&ots=ntAZaK3dJx&sig=fVy9r3SABi4xfDhw1K76ppsBYUw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Tim Hukumonline. (2024). Bunyi dan Makna Pasal 33 UUD 1945. In Https://Www.Hukumonline.Com/.
Wardani, D. E. K. (2024). Asset Recovery in Corruption Crimes. RADINKA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.56778/rjslr.v2i1.297
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ronald Sebayang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
