Tanggung Jawab Direksi Atas Kerugian Perseroan Berdasarkan UU Perseroan Terbatas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v5i2.6410Keywords:
Board of Directors of the Company, Business Judgment, Company Losses, Governance, ResponsibilitiesAbstract
The liability of directors for corporate losses under the Limited Liability Companies Act is a critical issue in corporate law, particularly in determining the boundary between the personal liability of directors and reasonable business risk. This study aims to analyze the regulations governing the personal liability of directors for corporate losses as well as the application of the Business Judgment Rule as the basis for exempting directors from liability under Indonesian corporate law. This study employs a normative legal method using both a statutory and a conceptual approach. The legal materials used include primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. The results of the study indicate that directors may be held personally liable if the company’s losses are proven to have been caused by their errors or negligence in the performance of their duties, as stipulated in Article 97(3) of Law No. 40 of 2007. However, Article 97(5) provides legal protection through the Business Judgment Rule if the board of directors can cumulatively prove the existence of good faith, due diligence, the absence of a conflict of interest, and preventive measures against losses. This study concludes that clearer guidelines are needed to distinguish between reasonable business risks and negligence on the part of the board of directors in order to strengthen legal certainty and corporate governance.
Downloads
References
Fikriya, T. N. (2020). Tanggung jawab direksi pada perseroan terbatas milik badan usaha milik negara. Lex Renaissance, 5(3), 592–606. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss3.art6
Gea, A. F., Hirsanuddin, & Djumardin. (2020). Tanggung jawab direksi atas terjadinya pailit perseroan terbatas. JESS (Journal of Education on Social Science), 4(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.24036/jess.v4i1.249
Gracio, A., Syukri, W., Aura, V., Jennifer, K., Cahya, N., Venus, & Sifa, N. (2025). Tanggung jawab direksi terhadap kerugian perseroan terbatas ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Legalitas: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.31293/lg.v10i1.8816
Harahap, M. Y. (2013). Hukum perseroan. Sinar Grafika.
Hertiawan, E. (2022). Penerapan doktrin business judgment rule di Indonesia. Klinik Hukum Online. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/penerapan-doktrin-ibusiness-judgment-rule-i-di-indonesia-lt62565dbe855a0/
Isfardiyana, S. H. (2015). Tanggung jawab direksi perseroan terbatas dalam pelanggaran fiduciary duty. Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 2(1). https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v2n1.a10
Kusumaningtyas, F. (2022). Tanggung jawab direksi dalam kepailitan perseroan terbatas berdasarkan Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas. Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI, 2(27).
Marzuki, M. (2018). Penelitian hukum. Kencana.
Mulyana, A. (2018). Business judgement rule: Praktik peradilan terhadap penyimpangan dalam pengelolaan BUMN/BUMD. PT Grasindo.
Pratiwi, R. S. (2019). Legalitas rangkap jabatan direksi dan dewan komisaris pada badan usaha milik negara yang berbentuk perseroan terbatas. Lex Renaissance, 4(2).
Raffles. (2020). Tanggung jawab dan perlindungan hukum direksi dalam pengurusan perseroan terbatas. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.3.1.107-137
Setyarini, D. M., Mahendrawati, N. L., & Arini, D. G. D. (2020). Pertanggungjawaban direksi perseroan terbatas yang melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 2(1), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.2.1.2020.12-16
Siahaan, G. P., Sunarmi, Ginting, B., & Siregar, M. (2024). Akibat hukum kepailitan perseroan terbatas yang diakibatkan perbuatan melawan hukum yang dilakukan oleh direksi. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 3(3), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v3i3.292
Supriyatin, U., & Herlina, N. (2020). Tanggung jawab perdata perseroan terbatas (PT) sebagai badan hukum. Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.25157/justisi.v8i1.3326
Syafitri, I., & Chairi, Z. (2025). Liability for unlawful acts under the business judgment rule and piercing the corporate veil doctrine. Lex Publica, 12(2), 429–447. https://doi.org/10.58829/lp.12.2.2025.323
Syahrin, B. A. A. (2025). Tanggung jawab direksi sebagai pengurus perseroan terbatas dalam penerapan doktrin piercing the corporate veil. Jurnal Darma Agung, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.46930/ojsuda.v33i2.5685
Widjaja, R. I. G. (2010). Hukum perusahaan. Mega Poin.
Yanuarsi, S. (2020). Kepailitan perseroan terbatas sudut pandang tanggung jawab direksi. Jurnal Solusi, 18(2), 283–297.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maria Yosefa Amorita Nathanasha

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






