Model Penyelesaian Konflik Hutan Adat Kemenyan melalui Skema Perhutanan Sosial antara Masyarakat Pandumaan Sipituhuta dengan PT Toba Pulp Lestari
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v5i1.5891Keywords:
Agrarian Conflict, Conflict Resolution Model, Conflict Transformation, Customary Forest, Social ForestryAbstract
The customary frankincense forest conflict in Pandumaan-Sipituhuta arose from overlapping claims between the customary community's management area and the PT Toba Pulp Lestari concession, reflecting the tenurial conflict problem in Indonesia. This study aims to analyze the process and model for conflict resolution through the Social Forestry scheme. For the Toba Batak indigenous community, this conflict is not only related to land protection but also encompasses the recognition of customary law community rights, power relations, and the legitimacy of the customary law system in national forestry governance. When the area was included in the state concession permit, tensions arose that reflected both agrarian conflict and the unequal power relations between the customary community and the state. Using a qualitative case study approach through interviews, documentation, and source triangulation, the research results show that the resolution was achieved through community consolidation, participatory mapping, legal advocacy, multi-stakeholder dialogue, and formal recognition through Ministerial Decree No. SK.5082/MENLHK-PSKL/PKTHA/PSL.1/8/2021. The Social Forestry Scheme not only addresses land conservation but also bridges customary and state legal systems, establishing a collaborative-transformative conflict resolution model based on the recognition of customary rights.
Downloads
References
Agusti, T. M., Nurjaya, N., & Koeswahyono, I. (2019). Implementasi regulasi perhutanan sosial yang bermanfaat bagi masyarakat sekitar hutan. Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 4(2), 300–309. https://doi.org/10.17977/um019v4i2p300-309
Alfian, A., Dinata, A. B., Kristian, A. P., & Triyunita, U. (2024). Penyelesaian konflik sertifikat hak milik yang tumpang tindih melalui mediasi. Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik, 2(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.51903/perkara.v2i1.1610
Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara. (2015). Laporan evaluasi tentang Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara (AMAN).
Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara. (2020). [Judul tidak tersedia], 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39800-2_1
Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
Fisher, M. R., Dhiaulhaq, A., & Sahide, M. A. K. (2019). The politics, economies, and ecologies of Indonesia’s third generation of social forestry: An introduction to the special section. Forest and Society, 3(1), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.6348
Indrizal, E., Nurti, Y., & Irwandi, A. (2025). Jurnal etnografi Indonesia. Etnosia: Jurnal Etnografi Indonesia, 10(1), 74–96. https://doi.org/10.31947/etnosia.v10i1.42480
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Humbang Hasundutan Nomor 3 Tahun 2019 tentang Peraturan Daerah Humbang Hasundutan. (2019).
Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia. (2016).
Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia Nomor 9 Tahun 2021 tentang Pengelolaan Perhutanan Sosial. (2021).
Ramsbotham, O., Miall, H., & Woodhouse, T. (2016). Contemporary conflict resolution (4th ed.). Polity Press.
Saragih, R. A., Sembiring, R., & Suhaidi, S. L. A. (2023). Analisis hukum penguasaan dan pengelolaan hutan adat oleh masyarakat adat. Locus: Journal of Academic Literature Review, 2(3), 243–260.
Sinurat, L. P. (2019). Hak atas tanah adat: Gerakan masyarakat adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta selama era reformasi. 485–498.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
