Rekonstruksi Peran Judex Facti dalam Perkara Narkotika (Analisis Putusan Banding Nomor 130/PID.SUS/2023/PT DKI)

Muh Amin Saleh; Junet Hariyo Setiawan

doi:10.55606/jhpis.v4i3.5569

Authors

Muh Amin Saleh Universitas MPU Tantular
Junet Hariyo Setiawan Universitas MPU Tantular

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v4i3.5569

Keywords:

electronic evidence, institutional case, judex facti, judicial review, narcotics crime

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the reconstruction of the judex facti role by the High Court in narcotics cases involving law enforcement officials. Using a normative juridical approach, this study conducts an in-depth analysis of Appellate Court Decision Number 130/PID.SUS/2023/PT DKI in the case of Inspector General Teddy Minahasa Putra. The findings reveal that the High Court failed to carry out its corrective function substantively as a judex facti. The study identifies three fundamental weaknesses: first, factual reconstruction was not supported by scientific verification and in-depth evidence analysis; second, there was non-compliance with electronic evidence standards as stipulated in Supreme Court Regulation No. 4 of 2020 and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law; third, structural bias was evident in handling this institutional case. This research recommends comprehensive reforms in the electronic evidence system through amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), standardization of digital chain of custody, and strengthening the impartiality of appellate courts. The study makes a significant contribution to the development of criminal procedure law in the digital era, particularly regarding the accountability of the appellate judiciary system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agung, M. (2024). Ringkasan Eksekutif laporan tahunan 2024: Dengan Integritas, Peradilan Berkualitas.

Akbar, T. N., & Hendra, H. (2021). Penerapan Asas in Dubio Pro Reo Pada Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Dalam Perkara Pidana. Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, 10(1), 86-98. https://doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v10i1.1189

Ali, M., Fernando, Z. J., Huda, C., & Mahmutarom, M. (2025). Deepfakes and Victimology: Exploring the Impact of Digital Manipulation on Victims. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 8(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56087/substantivejustice.v8i1.306

https://doi.org/10.56087/substantivejustice.v8i1.306

Alruwaili, F. F. (2021). Custodyblock: A distributed chain of custody evidence framework. Information, 12(2), 88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/info12020088

https://doi.org/10.3390/info12020088

Anggraeni, D. R., & Salsabila, M. (2024). Analisis yuridis peran digital forensik dalam pembuktian tindak pidana di Indonesia. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 2(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12513470

Badiye, A., Kapoor, N., & Menezes, R. G. (2023). Chain of custody. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing.

Basri, H. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana berdasarkan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 2(2), 104-121. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i2.90

https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i2.90

Bello, P. (2023). Sahkah Hukum Yang Buruk Secara Moral? Perdebatan Antara Lon Luvois Fuller Dan HLA Hart. Honeste Vivere, 33(2), 98-112. https://doi.org/10.55809/hv.v33i2.238

https://doi.org/10.55809/hv.v33i2.238

Bharati, R., Khodke, P. G., Khadilkar, C. P., & Bawiskar, D. S. (2024). Forensic Bytes: Admissibility and Challenges of Digital Evidence in Legal Proceedings. Int J Sci Res Sci & Technol. Jan-Feb-2024, 11(16), 24-35. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4896874

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4896874

Chandranegara, I. S., & Hoessein, Z. A. (2020). Defining judicial accountability post political transition in Indonesia. International Conference on Law Reform (INCLAR 2019), 17-23. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200226.004

https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200226.004

Chofa, F., & Locke, J. (2024). Sistim Pemerintahan. In Hukum Tata Negara (Vol. 41). CV. Gita Lentera.

Dwianisa, S. (2025). Analisis Upaya Hukum Banding Dalam Menjamin Keadilan Terhadap Proses Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Jurnal Yusthima, 5(1), 375-384. https://doi.org/10.36733/yusthima.v5i1.11490

https://doi.org/10.36733/yusthima.v5i1.11490

Efendi, R., & Utamy, H. R. (2023). Pembaruan Hukum Acara Pidana Di Indonesia. Deepublish.

Fadri, Z. (2020). Perubahan Struktural Fungsional Prostitusi Online dalam Pandangan Talcott Parsons. RESIPROKAL: Jurnal Riset Sosiologi Progresif Aktual, 2(2), 211-223. https://doi.org/10.29303/resiprokal.v2i2.40

https://doi.org/10.29303/resiprokal.v2i2.40

Gumeleng, F. (2022). Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Hakim Dalam Suatu Perkara Pidana Ditinjau Dari Pasal 183 Kuhap. Lex Privatum, 10(4). https://doi.org/https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/42404

Gupta, A. (1995). Blurred boundaries: the discourse of corruption, the culture of politics, and the imagined state. American Ethnologist, 22(2), 375-402. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1995.22.2.02a00090

https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1995.22.2.02a00090

Hartono, M. S., & Yuliartini, N. P. R. (2020). Penggunaan Bukti Elektronik Dalam Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 6(1), 281-302. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v6i1.23607

https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v6i1.23607

Hoesein, Z. A. (2012). Pembentukan Hukum dalam Perspektif Pembaruan Hukum. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 1(3), 307-327. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v1i3.87

https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v1i3.87

Ihugba, U. (2020). Introduction to legal research method and legal writing. African Books Collective. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.8155048

Ilyas, A. (2021). Independensi Penuntut Umum dalam Kebijakan Rencana Tuntutan Berjenjang untuk Menentukan Tuntutan Pidana. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 16(1), 120-129. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v16i1.29292

Ketut Sudira, Z. A. (2025). Redesain Pembaruan Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia: Mekanisme Pemeriksaan Perkara di Pengadilan Negeri. Prenada Media. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=yCxfEQAAQBAJ

Khan, M. N. I., & Ahmed, I. (2025). A Systematic Review of Judicial Reforms and Legal Access Strategies in the Age of Cybercrime and Digital Evidence. International Journal of Scientific Interdisciplinary Research, 5(2), 1-29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.63125/96ex9767

https://doi.org/10.63125/96ex9767

Kurnia, T. S. (2022). Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Sang Penjaga HAM. Penerbit Alumni.

Kusumawardani, T. (n.d.). Tinjauan Yuridis Kekeliruan Judex Factie Dalam Menyimpulkan Dakwaan Sebagai Sandaran Hukum Terdakwa Mengajukan Kasasi Terhadap Putusan Perkara Penyalahgunaan Narkotika. Verstek, 7(3).

Mardani. (2024). Teori Hukum: Dari Teori Hukum Klasik Hingga Teori Hukum Kontemporer. Prenada Media. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=o6_8EAAAQBAJ

Marwenny, E. (2024). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Polisi Yang Terlibat Dalam Peredaran Narkotika (Studi Kasus Peredaran Sabu Teddy Minahasa). Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik| E-ISSN: 3031-8882, 2(1), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.62379/7vqtg289

Mustafa, C. (2024). Integritas Chain Of Custody Pada Pemeriksaan Bukti Digital. Judex Laguens, 2(1), 75-96. https://doi.org/10.25216/ikahi.2.1.4.2024.75-96

https://doi.org/10.25216/ikahi.2.1.4.2024.75-96

Rohman, R., Muliadi, M., Pratama, F., Saputra, I., Firmansyah, A., Marwan, T., & Irfandi, I. (2024). Sistem Pembuktian dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia dan Tantangan dalam Proses Peradilan. Jimmi: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Multidisiplin, 1(3), 279-292. https://doi.org/10.71153/jimmi.v1i3.146

https://doi.org/10.71153/jimmi.v1i3.146

Setyadi, Y., & Padang, K. (2022). Penerapan Rehabilitasi Dan Pengobatan Pasien Narkotika Dalam Pasal 53 Dan Pasal 54 Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika. Journal of Law and Nation, 1(1), 9-16. https://doi.org/https://joln.my.id/index.php/joln/article/view/2

https://doi.org/10.56128/jkih.v2i4.34

Soewita, S. (2020). Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Pidana Mati Narkoba di Tinjau dari Undang-undang No 35 Tahun 2009. Pamulang Law Review, 3(2), 149-156.

https://doi.org/10.32493/palrev.v3i2.7991

Sriwidodo, J., & Bs, D. A. (2021). Upaya Percepatan Penyelesaian Perkara Di Pengadilan Menurut Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2020 Tentang Administrasi Dan Persidangan Perkara Pidana Di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik. Palar: Pakuan Law Review, 16, 1-23. https://doi.org/10/2021, disetujui 22/11/2021

https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v7i2.4252

Statistik, B. P. (2023). Statistik Kriminal 2023. https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2023/12/12/5edba2b0fe5429a0f232c736/statistik-kriminal-2023.html

Stoykova, R. (2021). Digital evidence: Unaddressed threats to fairness and the presumption of innocence. Computer Law & Security Review, 42, 105575. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105575

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105575

Wajdi, F., & Hasanuddin, M. I. (2022). Pengawasan hakim dan penegakan kode etik di Komisi Yudisial. Sinar Grafika.

Wirayudha, M. D. (2025). Diskresi Penegak Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana: Harmonisasi Keadilan Prosedural dan Substantif. HARISA: Jurnal Hukum, Syariah, Dan Sosial, 2(1)), 170-185. https://doi.org/10.23887/jiis.v7i2.37389

https://doi.org/10.23887/jiis.v7i2.37389