Tinjauan Yuridis Perusahaan Pailit yang Berdampak pada Hak- Hak Karyawan

Authors

  • Muhammad Hilmi Shofwan Ali Universitas Darul Ulum Jombang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v4i3.5563

Keywords:

Bankruptcy, Curator, Employee Rights, Legal Protection, Preferred Creditors

Abstract

The main issue in this study is the legal uncertainty regarding the protection of employees’ rights when a company is declared bankrupt. In practice, employees often occupy a weak position due to overlapping provisions between bankruptcy law and labor law, which results in unpaid wages and severance pay. This situation creates serious problems since employees are highly dependent on the company’s continuity for their livelihood. This research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and case approaches. The proposed solution is the need for synchronization between the Bankruptcy Law and the Manpower Law, as well as strengthening the legal position of employees as preferred creditors during the curatorial process. Furthermore, improvement of enforcement mechanisms is necessary to ensure that court rulings can provide stronger guarantees for employees’ rights. The findings reveal that although employees are normatively granted preferential rights, practical obstacles still exist, including conflicts of interest among creditors, limited company assets, and the weak role of curators in safeguarding employees’ entitlements. In conclusion, legal protection of employees’ rights in bankrupt companies has not been fully effective. Therefore, regulatory harmonization and the strengthening of legal instruments are required to ensure certainty and fairness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdurrahman, A. (1991). Hukum kepailitan di Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Amaliah, P. U. (2019). PHK akibat kepailitan: Analisis keadilan bagi pekerja. Jurnal Ketenagakerjaan dan Hukum, 10(3), 171–173.

Asikin, Z. (2021). Metodologi penelitian hukum. Prenadamedia.

Ayuda, S. (2024). Dampak sosial kepailitan terhadap pekerja. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, 12(2), 1–12.

Dewi, S. (2004). Aspek hukum kepailitan di Indonesia. Refika Aditama.

Ermawan, Y. (2019). Hukum perusahaan dan kepailitan. Airlangga University Press.

Fred, B. G. (2001). Kepailitan dan perlindungan hukum. Alumni.

Ginting, E. R. (2018). Kepailitan dan perlindungan hak-hak pekerja. Prenadamedia.

Jono. (2008). Hukum kepailitan Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Kurniawan, A. (2023). Keadilan dalam hukum kepailitan. Deepublish.

Mahadi. (2003). Filsafat hukum: Suatu pengantar. Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional (BPHN).

Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Pengantar ilmu hukum. Kencana.

Pramono, N., & Sularto. (2017). Reformasi hukum kepailitan pasca krisis moneter. UII Press.

Rahayu, R. M. A. (2025). Kedudukan hukum pekerja sebagai kreditor dalam proses kepailitan. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 55(1), 1–15.

Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang No. 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2003.

Republik Indonesia. (2004). Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU). Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004.

Republik Indonesia. (2020). Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2020.

Rusli, T. (2019). Kepailitan dan penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang. Kencana.

Sihombing, B. (2021). Hukum kepailitan: Perspektif kontemporer. Rajawali Pers.

Simanjuntak, H. (2020). Kreditor separatis, preferen, dan konkuren dalam hukum kepailitan. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1), 1–10.

Susanto, H. (2013). Hukum ketenagakerjaan. Rajawali Pers.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Muhammad Hilmi Shofwan Ali. (2025). Tinjauan Yuridis Perusahaan Pailit yang Berdampak pada Hak- Hak Karyawan. JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL, 4(3), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v4i3.5563