Analisis Kritis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 Terhadap Keberlangsungan Demokrasi dan Generasi Muda Indonesia

Authors

  • Afriman Oktavianus Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Ricci Otto F Sinabutar Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Risma Rachmawati Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v3i3.3946

Keywords:

Constitutional Court, Distributive Justice, General Elections

Abstract

General elections are an important foothold in the contemporary democratic system. Elections are a tangible form of procedural democracy, although democracy is not the same as elections, but elections are one of the most important aspects of democracy that must also be held democratically. Material test of Article 169 letter q of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections against Article 28D of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia to the Constitutional Court. Identification of the problem, namely how to consider the legal pros and cons of the Constitutional Court's decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 and what are the implications of the Constitutional Court's decision on the development of Indonesian democracy. The purpose of the study is to answer the problem identification, namely to find out the legal considerations of the pros and cons of the Constitutional Court's decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 and to find out the implications of the Constitutional Court's decision on the development of Indonesian democracy. The research method used is a normative juridical research method and the nature of this research is descriptive and qualitative. Article 28D paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution states that "Every citizen has the right to equal opportunities in government". This must be in line with the theory of distributive justice. The Constitutional Court's decision violates Sapta Karsa Hutama, the Principle of Propriety, the Principle of Non-Partiality, the Principle of Independence, the Principle of Integrity and Courtesy. However, the decision remains valid because the nature of the Constitutional Court's decision is final and binding. As a conclusion in this study, the Constitutional Court Decision is considered in accordance with the principle of distributive justice by adding experience in office as a condition so that it can produce leaders who are more prepared and competent in facing government challenges.

References

Ardipandanto, A. (2024). Kelemahan Pelaksanaan Debat Calon Presiden/wakil presiden 2024. Pusat Analisis Keparlemenan Badan Keahlian DPR RI, 16(1), 1-10.

BBC News Indonesia. (n.d.). MK putuskan Suhartoyo gantikan Anwar Usman sebagai ketua Mahkamah Konstitusi. Retrieved November 10, 2023, from https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-62186792

Budahu, M. A. S., Kasim, A., Lasatu, A., & Palilingan, T. N. (2022). Pemenuhan Hak Dipilih dan Hak Memilih sebagai Hak Konstitusional: Studi Komparatif Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Tumou Tou Law Review.

Data Indonesia. (n.d.). Tak Hanya Gibran, 42 Kepala Daerah Muda Kini Bisa Maju Pilpres. Retrieved May 21, 2024, from https://dataindonesia.id/data-pemilu/detail/tak-hanya-gibran-42-kepala-daerah-muda-kini-bisa-maju-pilpres

Hukum Online. (n.d.). Ada Akal-akalan Legal Standing Almas Tsaqibbirru dalam Putusan Batas Usia Capres-Cawapres? Retrieved May 22, 2024, from https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/ada-akal-akalan-legal-standing-almas-tsaqibbirru-dalam-putusan-batas-usia-capres-cawapres-lt652ea03f29e6f

IAIN Pare. (n.d.). Bahas Demokrasi Pasca Putusan MK Tentang Batas Usia Capres Kaprodi HTN Jadi Pembicara Nasional. Retrieved May 22, 2024, from https://www.iainpare.ac.id/blog/berita-1/bahas-demokrasi-pascaputusan-mk-tentang-batas-usia-capres-kaprodi-htn-jadi-pembicara-nasional-2623

Junaidi, V. (2009). Menata Sistem Penegakan Hukum Pemilu Demokratis: Tinjauan Kewenangan MK atas Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hasil Pemilu. Jurnal Konstitusi, 6(3).

Kumparan. (n.d.). Survei Indopol: Imbas Putusan 90, Kepuasan Pemerintahan Jokowi dan MK Merosot. Retrieved May 22, 2024, from https://kumparan.com/kumparannews/survei-indopol-imbas-putusan-90-kepuasan-pemerintahan-jokowi-dan-mk-merosot-21expKt6qhX

Liputan6. (n.d.). Survei LSI: Kepercayaan Publik ke MK Alami Tren Peningkatan hingga 73 Persen. Retrieved May 22, 2024, from https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/5576011/survei-lsi-kepercayaan-publik-ke-mk-alami-tren-peningkatan-hingga-73-persen

Mahkamah Konstitusi RI. (n.d.). Para Pelapor Sampaikan Alasan dan Bukti Dugaan Pelanggaran Kode Etik Hakim Konstitusi. Retrieved November 2, 2023, from https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=19736&menu=2

Raza, A. (2023). Reformulasi Pemimpin Usia Muda Sebagai Calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden: Tinjauan Ius Constituendum. Risalah Hukum, 20(2).

Renaldy, E. P. (2023). Pemilihan Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Thesis. Universitas Lampung.

Republik Indonesia. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia.

Republik Indonesia. (2017). Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilihan Umum.

Sa'adah, N. (2019). Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Pengawal Demokrasi Dan Konstitusi Khususnya Dalam Menjalankan Constitutional Review. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 2(2).

Sopacua, M. G., et al. (2023). Hukum Pemilihan Umum Indonesia. Bandung: Penerbit Widana.

Tempo.co. (n.d.). Mahkamah Konstitusi Dinilai Melunak Soal Legal Standing dalam Putusan Batas Usia Capres dan Cawapres. Retrieved November 1, 2023, from https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1785070/mahkamah-konstitusi-dinilai-melunak-soal-legal-standing-dalam-putusan-batas-usia-capres-dan-cawapres?page_num=2

Trijono, L. (2011). Reaktualisasi Politik Demokrasi: Politik Agensi dan Revitalisasi Kelembagaan Demokrasi. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 15(2).

Usman, S. (2008). Etika dan Tanggung Jawab Profesi Hukum di Indonesia. Tangerang: Gaya Media Pratama.

Published

2024-06-25

How to Cite

Afriman Oktavianus, Ricci Otto F Sinabutar, & Risma Rachmawati. (2024). Analisis Kritis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 Terhadap Keberlangsungan Demokrasi dan Generasi Muda Indonesia. JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL, 3(3), 373–385. https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v3i3.3946