Sistem Proporsional Terbuka Bukan Akar Politik Uang Dalam Pemilu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v3i3.3909Keywords:
electoral system, open PR system, party institutionalization, money politics, political corruptionAbstract
The influence of an open proportional representation system with a majority vote does not explain the rise of money politics and political corruption after the election period. Systemically, the influence of the electoral system is aimed more at establishing a stable party system and modeling coalition models to produce a model of political balance in managing relations between the Government and Parliament. Meanwhile, the quality of the implementation of the electoral system is actually determined by the quality of the institutionalization of political parties, including the tendency of the type of party. Money politics is the result of the poor quality of political institutions in a type of party that only focuses on electoral interests.
References
Abdussamad, G. M. A., Faralita, E., & Sulastri. (2023). Korupsi politik terlahir dari sistem pemilihan umum menggunakan sistem proporsional terbuka di Indonesia. Wasaka Hukum, 11(1), 62–77.
Arikunto, S. (2022). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktek. Reinika Cipta.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2011). Pengantar ilmu hukum tata negara (Edisi I, Cet. Ketiga). Rajawali Pers.
Dedi, A. (2019). Analisis sistem pemilihan umum serentak. Jurnal Moderat, 5(3), 213–226.
Effendi, A. (2017). Studi komparatif pengaturan sistem pemilihan umum anggota dewan perwakilan rakyat di Indonesia. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(2), 295–316.
Kansil, C. S. T., et al. (2023). Analisis sistem pemilihan umum proporsional tertutup di Indonesia. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 7(1), 882.
Khairunnisa, M., & Fatimah, S. (2023). Sistem proporsional terbuka dan tertutup pada pemilu di Indonesia serta kelebihan dan kekurangan. Jurnal Tana Mana, 4(1), 98.
Krouwel, A. (2006). Party models. In R. S. Katz & W. Crotty (Eds.), Handbook of party politics. Sage Publications.
Mainwaring, S., & Scully, T. R. (1995). Introduction: Party systems in Latin America. In R. S. Katz & W. Crotty (Eds.), Building democratic institutions: Party systems in Latin America. Sage Publications.
Mainwaring, S., & Torcal, M. (2006). Party system institutionalization and party system theory after the third wave of democratization. In R. S. Katz & W. Crotty (Eds.), Handbook of party politics. Sage Publications.
Pamungkas, S. (2009). Perihal pemilu. Laboratorium Jurusan Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Jurusan Ilmu Pemerintahan, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Pratiwi, D. A. (2018). Sistem pemilu proporsional daftar terbuka di Indonesia: Melahirkan korupsi politik? Jurnal Trias Politika, 2(1), 13–28.
Randall, V., & Svasand, L. (2002). Party institutionalization in new democracies. Party Politics, 8(1), 5-29.
Reynolds, A. B. R. (2005). Electoral system design. IDEA.
Riwanto, A. (2015). Korelasi pengaturan sistem pemilu proporsional terbuka berbasis suara terbanyak dengan korupsi politik di Indonesia. Jurnal Yustisia, 4(1), 89-102.
Schaffer, F. C. (Ed.). (2007). Elections for sale: The causes and consequences of vote buying. Ateneo De Manila University Press.
Wolinetz, S. B. (2006). Party system and party system types. In R. S. Katz & W. Crotty (Eds.), Handbook of party politics (pp. 51-62). Sage Publications.
Zamroni, S., Hariyanto, T., Mariana, D., Angga, R. D., Abisono, F. G., Musyaddad, A., & Sumirat, B. W. S. J. (2016). Partai politik, uang, dan pemilu (Cet. 1). IRE Yogyakarta.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
