Comparison Of Customary Law In Indonesia And Australia From The Terms Of Customary Rights Of Customary Law Communities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v3i1.3370Keywords:
Customary Law, Ulayat Right, Indonesia, AustraliaAbstract
The research aims to analyze and compare aspects of customary rights in the context of customary law in Indonesia and Australia. Customary privileges are an integral part of the life of customary law communities, which include traditional rights to land. This comparison provides in-depth insight into how two countries with different cultural and legal backgrounds manage and protect the ancestral land rights of their customary law communities. This study uses comparative legal procedures to explore the development, protection, and implementation of conventional rights in the two countries. Factors such as the history of colonialism, legislative changes, and local cultural influences play an important role in shaping the legal framework regarding customary rights. This analysis also includes case studies to provide a concrete picture of how traditional liberties are implemented in real situations in customary law communities. The findings of this research can provide a better view of the challenges and opportunities faced by customary law civilizations in defending the sustainability of their customary freedoms amidst the dynamics of modernization and globalization. In addition, this comparison can be a basis for improving policies and a better legal framework to ensure fair and sustainable protection of customary rights for customary law communities in both countries. This analysis presents a cross-cultural understanding of the management of customary rights and the potential integration of traditional law principles in a modern legal context.
References
Abdurrahman. (2014). Hukum Adat Menurut Perundang Undangan Republik Indonesia. Cendana Press.
Achmad, M. F. (2015). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Jurnal Pustaka Pelajar, 34.
Adharinalti. (2013). Eksistensi Hukum Adat Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintah Desa di Bali. Jurnal Hukum, 1(3).
Beeson, M. (2013). Issues in Australian Foreign Policy Australia. Journal of Politics and History, 48(2).
Bosko, R. E. (2014). Reconsidering the Inalienability of Communal Ulayat Rights: Theoretical Overview. The 9th ALIN Expert Forum, Land Rights Law in Asian Countries, 29.
Cticchley, S. (2015). Hubungan Australia dengan Indonesia: Faktor Geografi, Politik dan Strategi Kekuasaan. Jurnal Universitas Indonesia, 8(3).
Desvalini, A. (2019). The Australian Federation of Islamic Councils Incoporated. AFIC Constitution.
Gayo, A. A. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Hak Atas Tanah Adat (Studi Kasus di Provinsi Aceh Khususnya Kabupaten Bener Meriah). Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 1(3), 298.
Harsono, B. (2013). Hukum Agraria Indonesia : Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria, Isi dan Pelaksanaannya. Universitas Trisakti, 183.
Hartono, S. (2014). Dari Hukum Antar-Golongan ke Hukum Antar-Adat. Jurnal Iustitia, 15.
Pudjosewojo, K. (2016). Pedoman Pelajaran Tata Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Aksara Baru.
Rahmadi, A. (2022). Urgensi Penetapan Hak Ulayat Masyarakat Hukum Adat Terkait Kebijakan Pelayanan Pertanahan di Papua. Jurnal Tunas Agraria, 2(1), 18.
Santoso. (2013). Hukum Agraria Kajian Komprehensif. Jurnal Agraria, 3(2), 82.
Setiady, T. (2018). Intisar Hukum Adat Indonesia. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sudiyat, I. (2013). Hukum Adat Sketsa Asas. Jurnal Liberty, 2.
Surpha, I. W. (2019). Seputar Desa Adat dan Adat Bali. Jurnal SENADIMAS.
Wiranata, I. G. (2016). Hukum Adat Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2(3).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
