Legal Effects Of Bankruptcy On Marital Couples Without A Marital Agreement

(Analysis Of Supreme Court Decision Number: 510/PDT.G/2019/PN JKT.SEL)

Authors

  • Herpandu Hadiwibowo Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v2i4.2642

Keywords:

Bankruptcy, Marital Couples, Marital Agreement

Abstract

Male and female couples marry to have offspring. If a couple does not have a marriage agreement, it could affect the property they own together, especially if one goes bankrupt. This research is descriptive-analytical research that leads to normative juridical research. Based on the research results, it is found that in bankruptcy, the debtor (husband) cannot pay and settle debts with his creditors, resulting in a joint property without a marriage agreement being included in the bankruptcy. As a result of this decision, the debtor's wife did not accept. She filed a lawsuit with the South Jakarta District Court (Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 510/Pdt.G/2019/PN Jkt.Sel). It was stated that the lawsuit could not be accepted or rejected because the South Jakarta District Court lacked the authority to examine and decide on bankruptcy cases. According to the results, the union of property is the union of assets and the burden of payment. The legal consequences of marital property without a marriage agreement, if one of the parties falls into bankruptcy, the bankruptcy of the husband and wife against their joint property through a court decision will be considered joint bankruptcy by the provisions in Article 64, Paragraph 1, of Law No. 37 of 2004.

References

Atmadja IDG, Budiartha INP. 2018. Teori-teori Hukum. Malang: Setara Press.

Damanhuri HA. 2012. Segi-segi Hukum Perjanjian Perkawinan Harta Bersama. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju.

Joni. 2008. Hukum Kepailitan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Nopriansyah W. 2019. Hukum Bisnis di Indonesia Dilengkapi dengan Hukum Bisnis dalam Prespektif Syariah. Jakarta: Penerbit Kencana.

Purwati A. 2020. Metode Penelitian Hukum: Teori dan Praktek. Surabaya: CV. Jakad Media Publishing.

Saleh KW. 1980. Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia. 6th ed. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Satrio J. 2001. Hukum Perikatan, Perikatan yang Lahir dari Perjanjian. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Subekti R. 1987. Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: Citra Aditya Bhakti.

Subekti. 2005. Hukum Perjanjian. 1st ed. Jakarta: Intermasa.

Subekti R, Tjitrosudibio R. 1973. Kamus Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Subhan MH. 2008. Hukum Kepailitan: Prinsip, Norma dan Praktik di Peradilan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Sunarmi. 2009. Hukum Kepailitan. Medan: USU Press.

Sutedi A. 2009. Hukum Kepailitan. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Sinaga SM. 2012. Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Tatanusa.

Situmorang VM, Soekarso H. 1993. Pengantar Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia.

Soekanto S. 1986.Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press; 1986.

Suryatin R. 1993. Hukum Dagang I dan II. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.

Thalib S. 2009. Hukum Keluarga Indonesia. 5th ed. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Tjirosudibio, Subekti. 1981. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: PT. Pradnya Paramitha.

Yahman. 2014. Karakteristik Wanprestasi dan Tindak Pidana Penipuan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Dantes KF. 2021. “Dampak Hukum Putusan Pailit terhadap Harta Kekayaan Suami Istri yang Tidak Melakukan Perjanjian Perkawinan Pisah Harta.” Jurnal Pendidik Kewarganegaraan Undiksha. Vol. 9 (3) :917–23.

Istrianty A, Priambada E. 2015. “Akibat Hukum Perjanjian Perkawinan yang Dibuat Setelah Perkawinan Berlangsung.” Priv Law [Internet]. Vol. III (2): 84–92.

Available from: https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/164410-ID-akibat-hukum-perjanjian-perkawinan-yang.pdf.

Rokhim A. 2012. “Kedudukan Hukum Perjanjian Perkawinan sebagai Alasan Perceraian.” MMH [Internet]. 2012;41(1):59–64. Available from: https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/4623-ID-kedudukan-hukum-perjanjian-perkawinan-sebagai-alasan-perceraian.pdf

Tan W, Aprinata D. 2018. “Analisis Yuridis Perjanjian Kawin Pasca Perkawinan Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015.” Jurnal Judic Rev [Internet]. Vol. XX (1): 74–87. Available from:

https://journal.uib.ac.id/index.php/jjr/article/view/314

White MJ. 2011. “Corporate and Personal Bankruptcy Law: for Annual Review of Law and Social Science.” Issue 1: 3. Available from: https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102510-105401

Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata.

UU No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang perkawinan.

UU No. 16 Tahun 2019, Undang-undang (UU) tentang Perubahan atas Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan.

Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU/XIII/2015.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 510/Pdt.G/2019/PN Jkt.Sel

Putusan Nomor 165/Pdt-Sus-PKPU/2018/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-04

How to Cite

Herpandu Hadiwibowo. (2023). Legal Effects Of Bankruptcy On Marital Couples Without A Marital Agreement : (Analysis Of Supreme Court Decision Number: 510/PDT.G/2019/PN JKT.SEL). JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL, 2(4), 156–173. https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v2i4.2642