AKIBAT HUKUM PRAKTIK JUAL RUGI SEMEN CONCH DALAM PERSAINGAN USAHA INDUSTRI SEMEN DI INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v2i3.1806Keywords:
Business competition, Selling at a Loss,, Cement ConchAbstract
Competition in the business world has various ways by each business actor. Judging from the application of the principles of business competition in Indonesia, there are several rules that contain matters in carrying out the business world. All provisions contained in the laws and regulations regulate the rights and obligations of every business actor in running his business. Given the content of Law No. 5/1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition describes several actions or practices that are prohibited in competing to develop the business of every business actor in Indonesia. One of the prohibitions in the world of business competition is the practice of predatory pricing or commonly referred to as the act of selling at a loss. This practice is an act of selling products from production at prices far below the proper average. This study will discuss one of the case studies related to selling at a loss that occurred in the cement industry in Indonesia, especially in the province of South Kalimantan. Cement Conch which is a product of PT. Conch Cement was the party that was reported on the grounds that there was an alleged monopoly action in the form of a loss-selling practice. Conch cement companies are reported under the provisions of the article in the business competition law. In accordance with the KPPU's decision issued, stated that conch cement was proven to have carried out this practice. Regarding monopoly practices carried out by conch cement companies, we will review the legal consequences and responsibilities based on the applicable laws and regulations.
References
Andi Fahmi Lubis, dkk. 2017. Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Jakarta: Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU).
Akbar, T. H. (2020). Dugaan Jual Rugi (Predatory Pricing) Semen Conch DI Tinjau Dari Perspektif Hukum Persaingan Usaha (Doctoral dissertation, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jember).
Fadhilah, M. (2019). Penegakan hukum persaingan usaha tidak sehat oleh Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) dalam kerangka ekstrateritorial. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 3(1), 55-72.
Febrina, R. (2017). Dampak kegiatan jual rugi (predatory pricing) yang dilakukan pelaku usaha dalam perspektif persaingan usaha. Jurnal Selat, 4(2), 234-249.
I DW GD Riski Mada dan A.A Sri Indrawati, “Praktik Jual Rugi (Predatori Pricing) Pelaku Usaha Dala Perspektif Persaingan Usaha”, Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2017
Rezmia Febriana, “Dampak Kegiatan Jula Rugi (Predatory Pricing) Yang Dilakukan Pelaku Usaha Dalam Perspektif Persaingan Usaha”, Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 4, Nomor. 2, Mei 2017
SARI, I. P. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Usaha Yang Melakukan Jual Rugi Harga Semen Yang Menyebabkan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat (Studi Putusan No. 3/KPPU-L/2020) (Doctoral dissertation).
Sihombing, E. (2021). Kajian Hukum tentang Jual Rugi oleh PT Conch South Kalimantan Cement Ditinjau dari UU No. 5 Thn 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Sumatera Utara).
UU Dasar Tahun 1945.
UU No. 5 Thn 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.
Peraturan Komisi Nomor 6 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pedoman Pasal 20 UU Nomor 5 Tahun 1999.
