Kemampuan Guru Dalam Penggunaan Instrumen Penilaian Portofolio Dalam Pelaksanaan Supervisi Administrasi Di SMA Negeri 1 Padang Bolak Julu

Authors

  • Hadi Daud Siregar SMA Negeri 1 Padang Bolak Julu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/lencana.v1i4.2386

Keywords:

Portofolio, Administrative Supervision

Abstract

This school action research started with the problems faced by teachers of SMA Negeri 1 Padang Bolak Julu in carrying out learning evaluations. In conducting evaluations, teachers rarely use portfolio assessment. In fact, in learning that requires mastery of the material as well as the possession of good skills and attitudes, it would be better if an assessment instrument was used which provides opportunities for students to demonstrate their ability to solve problems, reason, communicate, conduct investigations, and be creative. The author as a school coach tries to provide assistance to teachers in using portfolio assessment instruments. The purpose of this research is to improve the teacher's ability to use portfolio assessment instruments. This type of research is action research using a qualitative approach. The research data is in the form of information about the process and action data obtained from observations, assessment results, discussions and documentation. The data source is the process of carrying out supervision activities at SMA Negeri 1 Padang Bolak Julu. Data analysis was performed using a qualitative data analysis model. Based on the results of the research, the supervision activities carried out were able to improve and contribute to improving the teacher's ability to use portfolio assessment instruments. This result can be seen from the assessment of the teacher's ability which has increased, namely in the first cycle the percentage of the average score obtained by the teacher was 72.5%, meaning that the teacher's pedagogical competence in this cycle was still in the sufficient category, while in cycle II, the percentage of the average score was the average obtained by the teacher increased to 87.5%, meaning that the teacher's ability to use portfolio assessment instruments in cycle II was in the good category. Thus it can be interpreted that supervision activities can improve teachers' abilities in using portfolio assessment instruments at SMA Negeri 1 Padang Bolak Julu.

References

A Dale Timpe. 1994. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Media Komputindo

Ahmad Sanusi 1991. Studi Pengembangan Model Pendidikan Profesional Tenaga Kependidikan, Bandung: IKIP Bandung

Alex Nitisesmito 1982. Manajemen Personalia, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia

Cece Wijaya, 1991. Kemampuan Dasar Guru dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Dachnel Kamars 2005. Administrasi Pendidikan Teori dan Praktek, Padang: UPI Press

Enco Mulyasa 2004. Manjemen Berbasis Sekolah. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Hendiyat Soetopo dan Wasty Soemanto 1988. Kepemimpinan dan Supervisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.

Hoetomo, 2005. Kamus Lengkap Bahasa Indonesia, Surabaya: PT. Mitra Pelajar

Jon Wiles and Joseph Bondi 1986. Supervision A Guide to Practice, Second Edition, USA: Columbnus Ohio

Kartini Kartono dan Dali Dula, 1987. Kamus Psikologi Pendidikan, Bandung: CV. Pionerjaya.

Kunandar 2007. Guru Profesional Implementasi KTSP dan Sukses Sertifikasi Guru. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Kunandar,2008. Guru Profesional Implementasi KTSP dan Sukses dalam Sertifikasi Guru, Jakarta: Grafindo Persada, 2008

Made Pidarta 1988. Manajemen Pendidikan Indonesia. Jakarta: Biro Aksara.

Menpan 1993. Jabatan Fungsional Guru dan Angka Kreditnya. Jakarta.

Mendiknas 2007. Standar Proses untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Biro hukum Depdiknas.

Moh. Uzer Usman 2008. Menjadi Guru Profesional. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya

Nana Sudjana 1997. Dasar-Dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Tarsito

Oemar Hamalik 2000. Psikologi Belajar dan Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo

Oemar Hamalik, 2004. Pendidikan Guru Berdasarkan Pendidikan Kompetensi, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Piet A. Sahertian 1994. Profil Pendidik Profesional. Yogyakarta: Andi Ofset.

Presiden RI 2003. Undang-Undang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional No.20/2003. Jakarta: Depdiknas

Qomari Anwar dan Syaiful Sagala 2004. Kependidikan dan Guru Sebagai Upaya Menjamin Kualitas Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Uhamka Press

Soetjipto dan Raflis Kosasi 2007. Profesi Keguruan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Sudarwan Danim 2002. Inovasi Pendidikan, Bandung: Pustaka Setia

Suharsimi Arikunto 1993. Organisasi Administrasi Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kependidikan, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada

Suryosubroto 1997. Proses Belajar mengajar di Sekolah.Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Syaiful Sagala 2004. Administrasi Pendidikan Kontemporer. Bandung: Alfabeta

T. Hani Handoko 1996. Manajemen Edisi I. Yogyakarta: BPFE

WS. Winkel 1999. Psikologi Pengajaran, Jakarta: Grasindo

Downloads

Published

2023-08-15

How to Cite

Hadi Daud Siregar. (2023). Kemampuan Guru Dalam Penggunaan Instrumen Penilaian Portofolio Dalam Pelaksanaan Supervisi Administrasi Di SMA Negeri 1 Padang Bolak Julu . Lencana: Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Pendidikan, 1(4), 316–329. https://doi.org/10.55606/lencana.v1i4.2386