Exploring the Factors of Focus Group Discussions in Developing Vocational Students’ Speaking Skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/juprit.v5i3.6769Keywords:
Collaborative Learning, Focus Group Discussion (FGD), Peer Scaffolding, Speaking Skills, Vocational EnglishAbstract
In vocational higher education, traditional teacher-centered instruction focused on grammar often leaves students with high communication anxiety and limited opportunity for authentic speaking practice, despite growing regional industrial demands in Cilacap Regency. This study investigated the implementation of Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) to explore factors contributing to students’ speaking skill improvement and identify the defining characteristics of student interaction. Using a descriptive qualitative method integrated with quantitative data triangulation within a collaborative research framework, the study involved 28 second-semester Agro-industrial Product Development study program at Politeknik Negeri Cilacap. Data were collected using quantitative pre and post-test combined with qualitative participatory observation and in-depth interviews. The quantitative results showed a 36,97% improvement in speaking fluency and a 72,28% increase in vocabulary mastery. Qualitatively, key factors supporting these improvements included reduced speaking anxiety through small-group peer scaffolding, active vocabulary use driven by practical topics such as marketing strategies and packaging design, along with strategic code-switching to handle language gaps. Interactional patterns shifted from passive reliance on the lecturer and long pauses into spontaneous turn-taking, active negotiation of meaning, and mutual problem solving. The study demonstrates that FGDs effectively serve as a supportive pedagogical tool for developing vocational students’ speaking skills.
Downloads
References
Arutmayanti, N., & Astuti, B. (2023). Effectiveness Of Group Guidance Services with Discussion Techniques in Reducing Academic Procrastination of Class X Students of SHS 4 Samarinda, Indonesia. European Journal of Education Studies, 10(9). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i9.4948
Barrass, R. (2006). Speaking for yourself “a guide for students”. Routledge.
Campbell, R. (2008). Guide To Focus Group Discussions. Agency for International Development.
Creswell, J. W. ., & Plano Clark, V. L. . (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE.
Denzin, N. K. ., & Lincoln, Y. S. . (2013). The landscape of qualitative research. SAGE Publications.
Hudson, C. C., & Whisler, V. R. (n.d.). Contextual Teaching and Learning for Practitioners.
Johns, A. M., & Salmani Nodoushan, M. A. (2015). English for Specific Purposes: The state of the art (An online interview with Ann M. Johns). International Journal of Language Studies, 9(2), 113–120.
Liu, H., Wang, Y., & Wang, H. (2025). Exploring the mediating roles of motivation and boredom in basic psychological needs and behavioural engagement in English learning: a self-determination theory perspective. BMC Psychology, 13(1), 179. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02524-3
Long, M. H. . (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley-Blackwell.
Novikova, О., & Suima, І. (2026). DEVELOPING ENGLISH FOR IT PROFESSIONALS: CHALLENGES AND STRATEGIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION. Journal “Ukrainian Sense,” (2), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.15421/462527
Nugraha, A. , & S. A. (20202). Analisis kecemasan komunikasi dan tantangan berbicara pada siswa sekolah menengah kejuruan. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 10(2), 145–158.
Pochana, T., & Sukying, A. (n.d.). The Effects of Cooperative Learning Techniques on Thai Secondary School Students’ Reading Comprehension ********.
Pratiwi, N. P. A., Suryani, I., & Suarnajaya, I. W. (2020). Investigating the inhibiting factors in speaking English faced by senior high school students in Singaraja. International Journal of Language Education, 4(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v4i2.10054
Pride, J. B. ., & Holmes, Janet. (1972). Sociolinguistics : selected readings. Penguin.
Rahman, M. (2015). English for Specific Purposes (ESP): A Holistic Review. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2015.030104
Sanulita, H., Lestari, S. A., Syarmila, Yustina, I., Atika, Nurillah, S., Iqbal, M., Elofhia, L., & Annisa, A. (2024). Keterampilan Berbahasa Reseptif : Teori dan Pengajarannya. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Simeon, J. C. (2014). Language Learning Strategies: An Action Research Study from a Sociocultural Perspective of Practices in Secondary School English Classes in the Seychelles.
Villabona, N., & Cenoz, J. (2022). The integration of content and language in CLIL: a challenge for content-driven and language-driven teachers. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 35(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2021.1910703
Virginiya, P. T., Yani, N. W. M. N., & Astuti, N. N. S. (2025). Investigating the Integration of Employability Skills in ESP (English for Specific Purposes) Classrooms (pp. 120–130). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-882-0_15
Zainal Abidin, M. Z. bin, Firdaus, A., & Md Syed, M. A. (2021). Komunikasi Strategik dalam Pengurusan Komunikasi Organisasi: Definisi, Pendekatan dan Pelaksanaan. Jurnal Pengajian Media Malaysia, 23(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.22452/jpmm.vol23no1.4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yoana Gita Pradnya Lengari, Yohanes Ragil Purnomo, Yuniarmelinda Ikha Meru Brahmanty, Dwi Ratih Nolaputri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






