The Correlation Between Students’ Motivation and Their Writing Ability During Online Learning in 7th Grade at MTsN 2 Payakumbuh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jupensi.v4i1.3368Keywords:
Students’ Motivation, Writing Ability, Online LearningAbstract
This research aims to find the correlation between students' motivation and writing ability during online learning. This research was conducted at MTsN 2 Payakumbuh because it cannot be denied that there are still students who face problems in writing, including students who are not interested and feel bored while studying, some students feel unmotivated to complete assignments, and students who have difficulty writing in English. The research method used is quantitative with a correlational design. The data were collected by using a questionnaire consisting of 30 statements to determine the level of student motivation, and students' writing scores during online learning to determine the level of students' writing ability. Researcher used 35 students from a population of 140 students with purposive sampling technique. To analyze the data, the researcher used the Spearman’s Rank. The results showed there is no significant correlation between students' motivation and their writing ability during online leaerning in 7th grade at MTsN 2 Payakumbuh” in this research.The researcher found the correlation coefficient between student motivation and writing ability in 7th grade MTsN 2 Payakumbuh was 0,102. Meanwhile t-table on df = 33 and = 0,05 was 0.344. It means, the rs was smaller than ttable and Ha is rejected. The magnitude lies between 0,00 – 0,199. Thus, there is a positive correlation between student motivation and writing ability during online learning in 7th grade MTSN 2 Payakumbuh.
References
Anderson, Gary. 2005. Fundamental of Educational Research, 2nd Edition. French: Taylor & Francis e-Library.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Arifmiboy. StatistikPendidikan,Bukittinggi: IAIN Bukitttinggi.
Barton, M. D. 2000. Rhetoric and Composition: A Guide for the College Writer. United States of America: Kaplan Univercity.
Bhatt, B. D. 2002. Modern Mhetods of Theaching; Concept and Thechniques. New Delhi: Kanishka Publiser.
Brown, H. D. 2001. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Longman.
Cohen, Louis, Lawrence Manion and Keith Morrsion 2007. Research Method in Education. New York: Routledge.
Gardner, R. C. 1985. Attitude/Motivation Test Battery: Tecnichal Report. London: Univercity of Western Ontario.
Gardner, R. C & Lambert. W. E. 1972. Attitudes and Motivation in Second Language Learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Gebhardt, dan Dawn Rodrigues. 1989. The Combridge Encyclopedia of Language Cambridge: Cambridge Univercity Press.
Gie, Liang. 1992. Pengantar Dunia Karang Mengarang. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Handoko, Martin. 1992. Motivasi Daya Penggerak Tingkah Laku. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Hannum, and Kardena, A. 2021. The Use of Indirect Corrective Feedback to Eliminate Grammatical Error in Students’ Writing at Tenth Geade of SMK 1 Padang Panjang. Vol. 3 No.2. Acitya: Journal of Teaching & Education.
Hatch, E. & Farhady, H. 1982. Research Design and Statistical for Applied Linguistics. Los Angeles: New Bury House Publisher, Inc.
Harmer, J. 2004. The Practice of English Language Teaching. New Jersey: Longman.
Heaton, J. B. 1988. Writing English Language Test. New York: Longman.
Hyland, ken. (2003). Gendre and Second Language Writing. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
Kardena, A and Anita, A, 2021. The Effect of Using Powtoon Toward Students’ Motivation in Writing. Vol.6, No.1, Jaruary. Journal Of English Language Pedagogy.
Kompri. 2016. Motivasi Pembelajaran Perspektif Guru dan Siswa. Bandung: PT Rosda Karya.
Mayers, A. 2005. Gateways to Academic Writing: Effective Sentences Paragraph and Essay. New York: Longman.
Reimes, A. 1983. Techniques in Teaching Writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
Reflinda. 2016. Ehnancing. Academic Writing Ability for Higher Education Students, Vision Vol 10 No. 10 Juli-Desember.
Sadirman. 2007. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sanjaya, Wina. 2010. Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Teori dan Praktek Pengembangan Kurikulum KTSP. Jakarta: Kencana.
Setiawan, E. 2012. Correlation between Motivation and Speaking Ability of Firs Grade Students of SMA Al Azhar 3 Bandar Lampung. Bandar Lampung: Lampung University.
Siregar, Sofyan.2013. Statistik Parametrik Untuk Penelitian Kuantitative. Jakarta:Bumi Aksara.
Sudjiono, Anas. 2010. Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers
Suparno dan Mohammad Yunus. 2006. Keterampilan Dasar Menulis. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
Syahrul and WidyaSyafitri. 2018. An Analysys of Students Anxiety In Academic Writing At Sixht Semester Students of English Education Departement In IAIN Bukittinggi. Vol 1, No 01. Educative Journal.
Oxford, R. & Shearin, J. 1994. Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Shouldknow. New York: Newbury House.
Tarigan, H. G. 1986. Pengajaran Kosakata. Bandung: PT. Angkasa.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sastra Inggris
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
